Comments on: ESC4 http://www.diagrams-conference.org/2020 11th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Diagrams, 24-28 August 2020 Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:06:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.23 By: Margit Pohl http://www.diagrams-conference.org/2020/index.php/program/empirical-studies-and-cognition/esc4/#comment-47 Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:18:43 +0000 http://www.diagrams-conference.org/2020/?page_id=310#comment-47 I hope I understood your comment correctly. We tried to do the changes systematically, so that sometimes we added nodes and links so that the shape changed considerably, or we added nodes and links so that edge crossings occurred or we added nodes and links in dense or empty areas. It is quite a challenge to do these changes systematically so that all the cases are considered.

]]>
By: Leonie Bosveld-de Smet http://www.diagrams-conference.org/2020/index.php/program/empirical-studies-and-cognition/esc4/#comment-42 Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:58:41 +0000 http://www.diagrams-conference.org/2020/?page_id=310#comment-42 Nice and well-focussed paper.
I can imagine a great amount of alterations of the base graphs used in your experiment. You categorize these alterations into differences in shape, density, and edge crossings in comparison to the base graphs. I was curious to know which are the criteria you have used for the alterations and their encodings in the DAGs of your experiment?

]]>