Comments on: P11 http://www.diagrams-conference.org/2020 11th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Diagrams, 24-28 August 2020 Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:06:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.23 By: Gem Stapleton http://www.diagrams-conference.org/2020/index.php/program/posters/p11/#comment-35 Tue, 25 Aug 2020 19:27:50 +0000 http://www.diagrams-conference.org/2020/?page_id=351#comment-35 Thanks Uta. I’ll look forward to seeing more publications in the future.

]]>
By: Uta Priss http://www.diagrams-conference.org/2020/index.php/program/posters/p11/#comment-32 Tue, 25 Aug 2020 14:49:28 +0000 http://www.diagrams-conference.org/2020/?page_id=351#comment-32 Thank you for your comment. Yes it would be interesting to formalise observability further. At the moment I am thinking of observability as an ordering relation amongst signs. Most likely a more specific definition of observability will depend on the type of sign and on the kind of information that is considered to be observable. I do intend to further work on this.

]]>
By: Gem Stapleton http://www.diagrams-conference.org/2020/index.php/program/posters/p11/#comment-23 Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:04:30 +0000 http://www.diagrams-conference.org/2020/?page_id=351#comment-23 Thank you for your presentation. Do you have plans to formalize observability in the case of Hasse diagrams? It would be interesting to see a formal charaterisation of their observational advantages as compare to, say, set theoretic expressions that include A subset B subset C, and in particular to constrast that with Euler diagrams.

]]>